Police may not summon to any one until any case registered against person. Sajjad Husain Advocate HC

Petitioner has approaches by filing petition with request for fair and proper investigation, MP high court at Jabalpur has rejected the plea for fair and proper investigation. See judgement    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1va6gc63nuMpmuQAOVZCqWOG9FQtvdBLk/view?usp=drivesdk

  Sending an important message to the Courts across the country, the Supreme Court recently lamented that the High Courts and Trial Courts have forgotten that bail cannot be denied as a punishment."Over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment," observed a bench comprising Justices [(Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra Judgement on Bail ) (Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra Judgement on Bail - Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra , p1) . https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rrKRCnT9Y8Qe1lipiXGq2x1Vew9u7fIl/view?usp=drivesdk

  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k38ZX85i9zEI39YQzcCVX33qlxX1pwZZ/view?usp=drivesdk 1.  Allahabad High Court sitting at Lucknow has held that pass port authority has no power to kept pending the passport application of citizens  2. Time bound disposal is mandatory  3. Pendency of criminal case is no ground to pending and kept the matter in pending  4. Pass port is right of citizen  5. Holding passport is fundamental right of citizens 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 19.03.2024 Pronounced on: 24.05.2024 + CRL.M.C. 8758/2023 & CRL.M.A. 7381/2024 VLS FINANCE LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Bharat Chugh, Mr.Jai Allagh, Mr.Maanish M. Choudhary, Mr.Ashok Kr. Sharma, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP for R-1/State. Mr.Vijay Agarwal, Mr.Gurpreet Singh, Mr.Jatin S.Sethi, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA J U D G M E N T    The judgment primarily addresses the issue of whether a victim or complainant in a criminal case has the right to be impleaded as a party in revision petitions and other criminal proceedings. The court's decision rests on the interpretation of several sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and relevant case law. Key Points of the Judgment: Right to be Heard vs. Right to be Impleaded: The court distinguished between the right to be heard and the right to be impleaded as a party in criminal...

  criminal appeals, Nos. 444 and 448 of 2014, heard by the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. These appeals challenge a judgment and order of conviction dated July 21, 2014, passed by the Special Judge in Chandrapur in a case concerning the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Here is a summary and analysis of the key points from the judgment: Background of the Case : The appellants, Prabhat s/o Ram Ambhurkar and Prashant s/o Shankar Chatreshwar, were convicted for offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The trial court convicted Prabhat Ambhurkar for offenses under Section 7 (public servant taking gratification other than legal remuneration) and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) (criminal misconduct by a public servant). Prabhat was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and fined Rs. 500, with additional imprisonment for non-payment of the fine​ ​. Points of Appeal : The appellants challenged the validity of the sanction order required for prosec...

UTTAR PRADESH SHASAN STAMP EVAM NIBANDHAN ANUBHAG-2 In pursuance of provisions of clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India, the Governor is pleased to order the publication of the following English translation of Government notification no. 18/2023/995/94-S.R-2-2023-700(29)2021 dated, 03 August, 2023. Notification Order No. 18/2023/995/94S.R-2-2023-700(29)2021 Lucknow, Dated, 03 August, 2023 In exercise of the powers under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Act no. 2 of 1899) as amended in its application to Uttar Pradesh, the Governor, until further orders, with effect from the date of the publication of this notification in the Gazette, by giving remission, in the stamp duty chargeable on gift deed under Article 33 of Schedule 1-B of the said Act of 1899 , is pleased to fix the maximum stamp duty as set out in column-2 of the table below on the gift deed as set out in column-1 of the table below:- Table Column-1 Column-2 Descriptio...